Inverse Data Envelopment Analysis of Cost Efficiency with a Network Structure in the Presence of Fuzzy Data

Authors

  • Mahsa Hamidi * Departmant of Applied Mathematics, Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran. https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1384-2330
  • Najmeh Malekmohammadi Department of Mathematics, Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.48314/anowa.v1i3.57

Abstract

The petrochemical industry is one of the most influential industries in the economy of oil-rich countries such as Iran, as well as in the global economy. To make informed managerial decisions in this field, managers must not only evaluate the past performance of organizations and identify sources of inefficiency, but also take existing constraints into account. Subsequently, they should set appropriate targets in line with the macro policies of the relevant industry and participate intelligently in global competition while moving toward the future. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is a powerful retrospective tool, whereas Inverse Data Envelopment Analysis (IDEA) is a forward-looking approach capable of estimating data. The combination of these two powerful tools enables managers to plan flexibly and knowledgeably. On the other hand, in the real world, data are often fuzzy. Therefore, efforts have been made to extend conventional network DEA models to the case of fuzzy data in order to obtain more realistic results, and to investigate and propose novel solution approaches. This paper proposes, based on the fuzzy arithmetic approach, a model that estimates inputs while keeping the overall process efficiency as well as cost efficiency constant, and allows outputs to change according to managerial preferences based on organizational objectives. The study has been conducted for a manufacturing workshop in the oil and petrochemical industry, and the obtained results indicate the high effectiveness and capability of the proposed model.  

Keywords:

Two-stage process data envelopment analysis, Inverse data envelopment analysis, Cost efficiency, Fuzzy data

References

  1. [1] Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (2000). Network DEA. Socio-economic planning sciences, 34(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0121(99)00012-9
  2. [2] Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European journal of operational research, 2(6), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  3. [3] Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management science, 30(9), 1078–1092. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
  4. [4] Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the royal statistical society series a: statistics in society, 120(3), 253–281. https://doi.org/10.2307/2343100
  5. [5] Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and control, 8(3), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
  6. [6] Kao, C., & Liu, S. T. (2000). Fuzzy efficiency measures in data envelopment analysis. Fuzzy sets and systems, 113(3), 427–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(98)00137-7
  7. [7] Saati, S. M., Memariani, A., & Jahanshahloo, G. R. (2002). Efficiency Analysis and Ranking of DMUs with Fuzzy Data. Fuzzy optimization and decision making, 1(3), 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019648512614
  8. [8] Puri, J., & Yadav, S. P. (2014). A fuzzy DEA model with undesirable fuzzy outputs and its application to the banking sector in India. Expert systems with applications, 41(14), 6419–6432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.04.013
  9. [9] Kao, C., & Liu, S. T. (2011). Efficiencies of two-stage systems with fuzzy data. Fuzzy sets and systems, 176(1), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2011.03.003
  10. [10] Lozano, S. (2014). Computing fuzzy process efficiency in parallel systems. Fuzzy optimization and decision making, 13(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-013-9170-0
  11. [11] Hatami-Marbini, A., Agarwal, S., & Saati, S. (2018). A common set of weights in fuzzy data envelopment analysis: A fuzzy goal programming approach with α-cuts. International journal of applied decision sciences, 11(3), 231–259.
  12. [12] Wang, Y. M., Luo, Y., & Liang, L. (2009). Fuzzy data envelopment analysis based upon fuzzy arithmetic with an application to performance assessment of manufacturing enterprises. Expert systems with applications, 36(3), 5205–5211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.06.102
  13. [13] Hu, C. F., Liu, F. B., Hu, C. K. (2018). Fuzzy data envelopment analysis with common weights for resource allocation. Journal of the operational research society, 69(12), 1955–1967.
  14. [14] Saeedi Aval Noughabi, F., Malekmohammadi, N., Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., & Razavyan, S. (2022). Efficiency decomposition in two-stage network in data envelopment analysis with undesirable intermediate measures and fuzzy input and output. Fuzzy information and engineering, 14(2), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/16168658.2022.2121153
  15. [15] Saeedi Aval Noughabia, F., Malekmohammadi, N., Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., & Razavyan, S. (2023). Efficiency decomposition in three-stage network with fuzzy desirable and undesirable output and fuzzy input in data envelopment analysis. International journal of intelligent computing and cybernetics, 16(4), 665–696. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJICC-12-2022-0306
  16. [16] Wei, Q., Zhang, J., & Zhang, X. (2000). An inverse DEA model for inputs/outputs estimate. European journal of operational research, 121(1), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00007-7
  17. [17] Yan, H., Wei, Q., & Hao, G. (2002). DEA models for resource reallocation and production input/output estimation. European journal of operational research, 136(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00046-7
  18. [18] Jahanshahloo, G. R., Hosseinzadeh, F., Shoja, N., Sanei, M., & Tohidi, G. (2005). Sensitivity and stability analysis in DEA. Applied mathematics and computation, 169(2), 897–904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2004.09.092
  19. [19] Jahanshahloo, G. R., Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., Shoja, N., Tohidi, G., & & Razavyan, S. (2004). The outputs estimation by using inverse DEA with undesirable outputs. Applied mathematics and computation, 171(2), 1251–1267.
  20. [20] Hadi-Vencheh, A., & Asghar Foroughi, A. (2006). A generalized DEA model for inputs/outputs estimation. Mathematical and computer modelling, 43(5), 447–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2005.08.005
  21. [21] Shiri Daryani, Z., & Razavyan, S. (2021). Input Estimation in Two-Stage Systems with Undesirable Outputs Based on Cost Efficiency. International journal of data envelopment analysis, 9(4), 89–102. https://dl.openaccess.ir/o/14dea/14dea-01090066_1_220726101531.pdf
  22. [22] Daryani, Z. S., Tohidi, G., Daneshian, B., Razavyan, S., & Lotfi, F. H. (2021). Inverse DEA in two-stage systems based on allocative efficiency. Journal of intelligent & fuzzy systems, 40(1), 591–603. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-200386
  23. [23] Kao, C., & Hwang, S. N. (2008). Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. European journal of operational research, 185(1), 418–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.11.041
  24. [24] Zimmermann, H. J. (2011). Fuzzy set theory—and its applications. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0646-0
  25. [25] Ghasemi, P., Ali, S. M., Abolghasemian, M., Malakoot, R. A., & Chobar, A. P. (2025). A stochastic sustainable Closed-Loop Supply Chain Networks for used solar photovoltaic systems: Meta-heuristic comparison and real case study. Sustainable operations and computers, 6, 15–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2024.11.001
  26. [26] Abolghasemian, M., Bigdeli, H., & Shamami, N. (2024). Locating Routing Problem (LRP) of distribution of priority support items to ground forces in war conditions. Engineering management and soft computing, 10(1), 262–292. https://doi.org/10.22091/jemsc.2024.11320.1206
  27. [27] Abolghasemian, M., Bigdeli, H., & Shamami, N. (2024). Modeling the positioning of support forces in future battles using data envelopment analysis and the principles of natural and managerial accessibility. Defensive future studies, 9(32), 65-98. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/dfsr.2024.2007554.1720
  28. [28] Sorourkhah, A., Azar, A., Babaie-Kafaki, S., Shafiei Nik Abadi, M., & Author, C. (2017). Using weighted-robustness analysis in strategy selection (case study: Saipa automotive research and innovation center). Industrial management journal, 9(4), 665–690. 10.22059/imj.2018.247856.1007361
  29. [29] Montazeri, F. Z., Sorourkhah, A., Marinković, D., & Lukovac, V. (2024). Robust-fuzzy-probabilistic optimization for a resilient, sustainable supply chain with an inventory management approach by the seller. Big data and computing visions, 4(2), 146–163. https://doi.org/10.22105/bdcv.2024.481945.1208

Downloads

Published

2025-09-29

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 3 (2025): Annals of Optimization With Applications (ANOWA)

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Hamidi, M. ., & Malekmohammadi, N. . (2025). Inverse Data Envelopment Analysis of Cost Efficiency with a Network Structure in the Presence of Fuzzy Data. Annals of Optimization With Applications, 1(3), 204-220. https://doi.org/10.48314/anowa.v1i3.57

Similar Articles

11-19 of 19

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.